So, recently Palm went up for sale and for about a week and a half, the entire Internet was wondering who was going to buy them. I’ll admit I was doing some speculating myself. The result is fairly surprising, and only a little bit hilarious, I’ll admit.

I’d thought it was going to be HTC or Microsoft or maybe even Apple, just to get a whole bunch of patents. The actual buyer turned out to Hewlett Packard, which I find funny for a few reasons.

HP already makes Windows Mobile phones, and before they got Compaq several years ago, Compaq (using devices manufactured by HTC, actually) was considered to be a huge innovator in the then-brand-new Pocket PC market, when Microsoft (and its device manufacturers, Sharp, Casio and Compaq, if I remember correctly) could probably have totally destroyed Palm and the Palm OS ecosystem if they’d wanted to, or were somehow capable of it.

I don’t know what HPs current devices are like, but they run winmo, and they do sell one or two of what I’ve found to be just about the only available non-phone PDA devices. Some of them have GSM connectivity built in but HP already makes winmo phones, and before they got Compaq several years ago, Compaq (using devices manufactured by HTC, actually) was considered to be a huge innovator in the then-brand-new Pocket PC market, when Microsoft (and its device manufacturers, Sharp, Casio and Compaq, if I remember correctly) could probably have totally destroyed Palm and the Palm OS ecosystem if they’d wanted to, or were somehow capable of it.

I don’t know what HPs current devices are like, but they run winmo, and they do sell one or two of what I’ve found to be just about the only available non-phone PDA devices. Some of them have GSM connectivity built in but you can buy the devices either from AT&T (in the case of the iPaq Glisten) or from HP (in the case of the Glisten and their other devices) and use them without ever putting a SIM chip in, or paying $30/month for a smartphone data plan. Except that I love having the Internet everywhere I go via a data plan, I really did even consider getting or using a regular or feature phone (on any network) and then getting a separate PDA, and these were on the list.

PDAs are interesting devices. I had one several years ago, a Palm Tungsten|E. Yes, there was a pipe in the name… That’s how awesome Palm was at the time. I got one and admittedly wasn’t too terribly into it, because I was doing all of my scheduling and note-taking on the steno pad. Part of it was that I didn’t know the context for the use of a PDA, and part of it is that Palm’s OS just wasn’t super great for what I needed/wanted to do. I don’t know whether or not Windows Mobile (then called Windows CE or Windows Pocket PC, as I recall) would have been any better… but it was definitely in color, and had a fairly windows-like multitasking capability, along with a few other things.

Another thing I’ve noticed is that in the past, a PDA was definitely a very computer-dependent device. Pocket PC and Palm alike used software installers that actually used your computer and device synchronization connection to install applications and get data in and out of the device. However, with the advent of smartphones, the focus has shifted away from devices being completely dependent on a computer to being fairly independent. When the iPhone first came out, it was pretty much locked into a Mac or PC for loading apps and synchronization of data, if you chose to do so, but with more recent iterations of the software, you can turn it on, activate it, and then buy music and applications directly on the device, and hook it up to an Exchange, Google or MobileMe account in order to perform data synchronization through the cloud.

Anyway… what does HP intend to do? I can’t say. I’m sure both HP and Palm tend to get as much as they can from their current products before doing anything rash such as introducing an HP hardware design with Palm WebOS on it, or canceling all of their current products (some of which are known to be launching on certain GSM networks soon.) The future of the HP slate is currently in question, as it would be against Palm’s interests for them to release it with full-on Windows 7 on it, however this means that something I’ve already been considering vaporware will take even longer, because Palm needs to work on making WebOS (and apps) work with different screen sizes, and a few other things. The saying might go, “iPhone OS wasn’t built in a day.”

Am I interested in what’s going to go on? Sort of. I’m not an existing stakeholder in any way. Although I do like HP’s current WinMo products, I don’t own one and I’m not sure I’d recommend one to anybody looking for an actual phone with service, as I have good experience with HTCs mobile phones. I’m also flat-out uninterested in WebOS, as I don’t think Palm’s got the best hardware for it, and the hardware they do have, I don’t like. If WebOS were ported, well, to a device like the TouchPro2, I’d be interested in seeing it. I suspect that we could see some really interesting things a year or so down the road, however. Palm is a creative company, and HP is a company with a lot of money, and together, they could do a lot.

One thought that occurred to me this morning is that in the past year or so, I’ve been very lax on what used to be a very strong policy of mine to keep a daily log in some form or another. When I stopped using my Steno pad as an organizer and journal so much, the way I did in high school, I switched over to blogging on nearly a daily basis, one or two of the big events or things that occupied my mind on that particular day. After that, I went back to the Steno Pad again, thinking it would be easier and even was telling people I liked it because it turned on instantly, it had a huge display and great user interface.

After that, when I’d decided to try using my iPhone as a daily log, I pretty much stopped having one most days. Admittedly most of those days weren’t necessarily incredibly important, but it’s still nice to be able to flip through my life as it had been once in the past and see what I was doing and thinking about. Necessary? By no means, but it’s also a way for me to record thoughts, quotes and anecdotes to be used later on my blog, or referred to later while reminiscing, or whatever.

One of the things I tried to do with my TouchPro2 was to determine the best possible way to get take these notes in a digital format, as my desire to be dependent upon paper products continues to decrease. I love paper, but I hate buying it,  hauling it around, not having it when I need or want it the most, and the variety of other inconveniences it can pose, such as my inability to read my own handwriting,  the inability to quickly send any bit of the text to somebody else, and the inability to search it later on. I can’t just search my old steno pads for the text “Geometry the Musical” — unfortunately.

So far, there have been two solutions I tried on the TouchPro2. The first of which seemed the most obvious at first, synchronizing a “Notes from Phone” section of my OneNote notebook between SuperSlab and the phone. This produced a situation where I could pre-create notes for all of the days in the month, then write on them, hypothetically from either the PC or the phone, and then just bring them together with synchronization.

Unfortunately, OneNote is mired in problems with synchronization. It simply can’t sync, or it copies in an entirely new copy of your mobile OneNote notes if you do something like edit the notes on your PC when  you have made other unsynchronized changes on your phone. It can’t just keep a phone and a PC version of that page, it does up a copy of the entire notebook, leaving you to figure out what changes need to be merged manually. Additionally, my phone can be synchronized through either bluetooth, or by hooking it up to USB. However, changing the way you sync the phone actually creates a new notebook in OneNote, which means if I’m not paying attention, I could easily (and have) end up with a half dozen different notebook files with different versions of everything in it. There’s some very huge room for improvement here.

The idea of using OneNote was that eventually Microsoft was going to release the Office OneNote Web App, which promises to be just about as awesome as the OneNote desktop app, but accessible from the Web. There are a few ways this works. Firstly, you can use it in a browser, just like all other web apps. However, the real power that’s supposed to be available is the ability to create a notebook on the web from within the desktop app, and sync it either at an interval, when changes are made, or just on command. Then, you are purportedly able to sync your OneNote web notebook (or one of them) with your phone Again, either continuously, on-demand, as needed or at an interval. I know Office 2010 isn’t officially released yet, but this functionality would have made the beta way better. Way better.

Then, I re-discovered (or initially discovered, I’m never sure which it was) Evernote, an app that lives on the web and in a huge variety of desktop and mobile applications, and that does exactly what I wanted the OneNote web app to do. Except in a far more terrible fashion. The idea is pretty solid, and the execution is, I’d say, at least 70% there. The missing 30% though is the exact reason that I still can’t bring myself to use EverNote for in-class note taking. It just lacks the formatting capability and ease that OneNote has, which won me over to the program for notetaking and information gathering compared with a traditional word processor, outlining app, or text editor. So while Evernote is 70% “there” for me, OneNote is probably 85% so, just because despite some idiosyncrasies with synchronization, it lets me very easily create pretty flexible tables, insert drawings with a mouse or a tablet, and it has better note organization functionality, at least for me. I think the remaining bits of OneNote being suitable for note taking will be fixed by me either setting up a WebDAV server that OneNote can use for note synchronization

The other part of daily recording is willpower and remembering to do so. Part of why I remembered to write things down was that I had the thing in my pocket or carried it around, and a lot of people had this really weird interest in it, often saying things such as “Ooh, what have you put in it today?” or “Oh, can I write something in it?” Odd, but it helped keep me interested too. These days, there’s no real interest in somebody who writes everything down in a mobile phone, and the steno pad is a little bit too cumbersome, especially as sometimes I’m on my computer and sometimes I’m just walking around. I carry one around, but it tends to be for special use cases, like when I have an appointment where I need to take notes, or where I’m working on a specific project or information gathering task where I will need to write information down.

We’ll see what happens from here. I’ll probably continue to try to find new and interesting ways to record things that happen to me throughout the day. I may try doing things like becoming a more active user of Twitter or Facebook to record things as they happen, or I may continue to search for (and find) other notetaking solutions, maybe even choosing to have separate solutions for the phone (where evernote has all the formatting I’d legitimately need) and the computer (where the added complexity of OneNote is very easy to use and helpful) and even a physical note taking “platform” like provisioning a new steno pad for the fall 2010 semester.

As of late, SuperSlab has been acting odd, not in that I have caught spyware or that the machine needs massive physical repair, just that the machine and its OS are in need of some tuning up. The OS needs to be updated, I need to re-do and update a lot of the ThinkVantage tools and drivers to get the display brightness controls working properly again. The whole thing has had a lot shorter runtime as of late, quite suddenly. Additionally, the system has been running hot due to what I suspect is a build up of dust.

I had originally wanted to keep the thing maintained better through it’s lifetime, but I’ll admit I’ve been way too busy to randomly disassemble my main computer in order to clean things and remove the dust.

I’ve already gone through a lot of the software cleaning, and hopefully just that will help improve the battery life again, and I intend to clean out the hardware sooner rather than later — over the summer at the latest. We’ll see what happens with its battery runtimes and temperatures at that time, even though I suspect I may need to look at getting new batteries at the end of this summer, just due to the very diminished capacity of my two batteries. Something to think about later on though.

As of last night, I’ve started using the iPhone again, both to continue reading the most recent book club book, as well as to listen to music as I walk around, or am waiting for things to happen. This is the iPhone that, as I have mentioned several times, is pretty severely broken. I hadn’t thought of it in this way before, but you might say that it’s past its prime.

I was told recently by one of my supervisors that there have recently been a few rumors floating about concerining a version of the newest iPhone hardware for VerizonWireless, and I almost immediately said (paraphrased slightly), “I don’t actually think it’ll happen, as Apple has had three hardware generations’ opportunity to do this, but if they do, I might have to be the first in line to get one.”

It was odd, thinking about getting another iPhone. My supervisor then asked  why I’d do that, especially as I’m very strongly on the record as having switched to a Windows Mobile handset, and being interested in Android-based handsets.

Part of what would make a new generation of the iPhone significant, for me, is the possibility that I could have the incredible ease of use, fantastic Internet browser, fantastic calendar and contacts applications, along with the fantastic music playing application, in a larger form factor (hypothetically) along with some multitasking that would let Pandora or other background-suitable apps like an SSH client or IM application continue to run in the background.

… Anyway, it occurs to me that not only is my specific iPhone a little bit physically damaged, but that the first generation, EDGE iPhones in general are old. They can run the current iPhone software, but for how long? An interesting thing about which to think, as soon as I get over the fact that the TouchPro2 is extremely unlikely to ever run Windows Phone 7, even with the help of the homebrew community.

One thing I noticed a few days ago is that the newest generation of Lenovo ThinkPad computers, which now have the Core i5/i7 processors on the latest mobile chipsets and with the latest mobile GPUs now lack something that the previous generation (of which my T400 is a member) had. Switchable graphics. It seems odd to me because in the previous generation of mobile computers, hybrid and switchable graphics solutions were available not only from Lenovo, but also Dell, Apple and possibly Hewlett Packard, and were heralded as increasing battery life while on the go, and increasing performance while at a desk and needing the additional graphics power for games or 3d applications.

Switchable graphics is a really cool solution. In professional notebooks it does indeed offer really great power savings when you’re out and about, SuperSlab my T400 can achieve more than ten hours of battery life if I’m conservative with my usage (as in a situation where I’m writing) and it can achieve five or six hours if I have the screen at full brightness and am using wireless networking. But when I’m at my desk, I can purportedly flip over to the discrete graphics solution and have a significant increase in graphical horsepower available for such situations as playing 3d computer games or doing 3d modeling, animation or other content creation work.

Unfortunately, at least in the ThinkPad T400, the graphics chip included on the discrete side of the switchable solution was a fairly weak chip, paling in comparison to the GeFORCE 8600GT I had given to Meaghan because flatdell didn’t need it, but her computer Washbyrne did need it (for The Sims 3, naturally.) The reason I’d gotten the discrete graphics originally was that I wanted to make sure that flatdell was able to remain the server and that SuperSlab the then-new machine would be able to handle desktop productivity/Internet usage as well as well as gaming and other high end graphics tasks that might have involved the GPU. The reality of the situation, and I suspect this is what the OEMs have realized, is that the games and other 3d applications I wanted to run have very poor performance with the discrete graphics chip in SuperSlab, which is an ATi Radeon HD 4370 with 256MB of memory. I suspect the actual performance bottleneck in this situation is that this system has just 256MB of graphics memory, compared to the 512mb of graphics memory on my GeFORCE 8600GT chip.

So far, Apple has yet to introduce a machine in the current generation, with i3/i5/i7 processors, which means that they are still shipping switchable-graphics machines.  Apple’s 15- and 17-inch professional notebooks have a 512MB nVidia GeFORCE 9600GT on the discrete side of their discrete solution, which is hypothetically (and probably realistically) capable of providing far more performance than the ATi Radeon HD chip featured in the ThinkPad T400 and T500 machines, just because of the additional video memory. Apple’s solution is slightly unfortunately implemented in that the GPU switch necessitates that you log out and log back in, whereas Dell and Lenovo were able to implement it in such a way that you simply invoke a software switch and in just a few moments, without quitting your applications.

Running anything other than Windows Vista or 7 on a ThinkPad with switchable graphics is a bit difficult because rather than switching immediately or switching upon logout, you must turn one of these machines all of the way off, enter the BIOS, and choose a graphics mode, turn the machine off again, and then turn it back on. The machine boots back up, at which point you need to make sure you have the correct graphics driver installed.

My question is whether or not switchable graphics solutions really are dead. Because Apple has yet to introduce the next generation of it’s MacBook Pro notebook computers, there is opportunity here for them to either say that switchable graphics solutions are here to stay, or that the point of purchase is when you decide what type of graphics subsystem your mobile computer has. If Apple keeps switchable graphics solutions going, other manufacturers may pick it back up. It may just also be a limitation of this generation of processors and chipsets. We’ll see what happens whenever Appe makes its next move.