So, recently Palm went up for sale and for about a week and a half, the entire Internet was wondering who was going to buy them. I’ll admit I was doing some speculating myself. The result is fairly surprising, and only a little bit hilarious, I’ll admit.
I’d thought it was going to be HTC or Microsoft or maybe even Apple, just to get a whole bunch of patents. The actual buyer turned out to Hewlett Packard, which I find funny for a few reasons.
HP already makes Windows Mobile phones, and before they got Compaq several years ago, Compaq (using devices manufactured by HTC, actually) was considered to be a huge innovator in the then-brand-new Pocket PC market, when Microsoft (and its device manufacturers, Sharp, Casio and Compaq, if I remember correctly) could probably have totally destroyed Palm and the Palm OS ecosystem if they’d wanted to, or were somehow capable of it.
I don’t know what HPs current devices are like, but they run winmo, and they do sell one or two of what I’ve found to be just about the only available non-phone PDA devices. Some of them have GSM connectivity built in but HP already makes winmo phones, and before they got Compaq several years ago, Compaq (using devices manufactured by HTC, actually) was considered to be a huge innovator in the then-brand-new Pocket PC market, when Microsoft (and its device manufacturers, Sharp, Casio and Compaq, if I remember correctly) could probably have totally destroyed Palm and the Palm OS ecosystem if they’d wanted to, or were somehow capable of it.
I don’t know what HPs current devices are like, but they run winmo, and they do sell one or two of what I’ve found to be just about the only available non-phone PDA devices. Some of them have GSM connectivity built in but you can buy the devices either from AT&T (in the case of the iPaq Glisten) or from HP (in the case of the Glisten and their other devices) and use them without ever putting a SIM chip in, or paying $30/month for a smartphone data plan. Except that I love having the Internet everywhere I go via a data plan, I really did even consider getting or using a regular or feature phone (on any network) and then getting a separate PDA, and these were on the list.
PDAs are interesting devices. I had one several years ago, a Palm Tungsten|E. Yes, there was a pipe in the name… That’s how awesome Palm was at the time. I got one and admittedly wasn’t too terribly into it, because I was doing all of my scheduling and note-taking on the steno pad. Part of it was that I didn’t know the context for the use of a PDA, and part of it is that Palm’s OS just wasn’t super great for what I needed/wanted to do. I don’t know whether or not Windows Mobile (then called Windows CE or Windows Pocket PC, as I recall) would have been any better… but it was definitely in color, and had a fairly windows-like multitasking capability, along with a few other things.
Another thing I’ve noticed is that in the past, a PDA was definitely a very computer-dependent device. Pocket PC and Palm alike used software installers that actually used your computer and device synchronization connection to install applications and get data in and out of the device. However, with the advent of smartphones, the focus has shifted away from devices being completely dependent on a computer to being fairly independent. When the iPhone first came out, it was pretty much locked into a Mac or PC for loading apps and synchronization of data, if you chose to do so, but with more recent iterations of the software, you can turn it on, activate it, and then buy music and applications directly on the device, and hook it up to an Exchange, Google or MobileMe account in order to perform data synchronization through the cloud.
Anyway… what does HP intend to do? I can’t say. I’m sure both HP and Palm tend to get as much as they can from their current products before doing anything rash such as introducing an HP hardware design with Palm WebOS on it, or canceling all of their current products (some of which are known to be launching on certain GSM networks soon.) The future of the HP slate is currently in question, as it would be against Palm’s interests for them to release it with full-on Windows 7 on it, however this means that something I’ve already been considering vaporware will take even longer, because Palm needs to work on making WebOS (and apps) work with different screen sizes, and a few other things. The saying might go, “iPhone OS wasn’t built in a day.”
Am I interested in what’s going to go on? Sort of. I’m not an existing stakeholder in any way. Although I do like HP’s current WinMo products, I don’t own one and I’m not sure I’d recommend one to anybody looking for an actual phone with service, as I have good experience with HTCs mobile phones. I’m also flat-out uninterested in WebOS, as I don’t think Palm’s got the best hardware for it, and the hardware they do have, I don’t like. If WebOS were ported, well, to a device like the TouchPro2, I’d be interested in seeing it. I suspect that we could see some really interesting things a year or so down the road, however. Palm is a creative company, and HP is a company with a lot of money, and together, they could do a lot.