One of the most annoying but most prominent components of this school year has been Winterpocalypse, Flagstaff’s worst winter in several years. So far, there have been several components to Winterpocalypse.

Part I of Winterpocalypse was a massive snow storm that we saw during finals week in December, 2009. It was the first real blizzard Flagstaff had seen in a decade or longer, and it was the first time in, purportedly, just about ever,  the university had canceled classes during finals week.

Part II of Winterpocalypse happened over the winter break, I’m just really sure that snow fell then.

Part III of Winterpocalypse was in mid-January when school was, again, delayed and then canceled for a few days while the university, the city and the state all declared a state of emergency and tried to catch up with the snow clearing.

After that, there was a few weeks of calm, slightly rising temperatures, which I have called “The Spring of False Hope.” We even lost an inch or so of the accumulation due to the slight amount of heat involved in The Spring of False Hope. Directly after the Sprint of False Hope, came Part IV of WinterPocalypse.

In Part IV, we got two phases of snow — the first was rain coupled with slightly slushy type snow that tends to be fairly fun in that it starts sticking to the ground very quickly, and very terrifying in that traveling down I-17 or I-40 is at a speed of about 20 to 30 miles per hour. The slush was followed directly by what I consider to be just about the worst possible type of snow. Snow so light and dry that later on the day it stopped falling, it was still like it was falling to people walking around, except faster, being blown around by nearly gale-force winds.

By today, it seems as though another Spring of False Hope has started — today I wore normal shoes to work, and the sun was even warm on my skin as I walked from the dorm to work. How long this will last, nobody knows.

Over the weekend one of my projects was to take a trip to Kingman and help my brother get his computer working again. He had called me on Tuesday or Wednesday of the previous week to let me know that his computer had gotten the Security Tool virus, and was wondering if there was any solution for it.

Essentially, it’s not something I trust myself to fix, so I told him I would try to make a trip down to Kingman to help out by doing what I know how to do — reformatting it. I packed my Windows XP disk and my Dell Dimension 2350 drivers disc, but I also packed my Ubuntu 9.10 disc, thinking  that it would help with saving his data to an external disk, as well as potentially becoming the new installed operating system on the machine, as I am indeed well aware that, for someone who knows how to do what they need to with it, Ubuntu Linux has the capability of being a very powerful, stable and secure computing environment.

Unfortunately, I spent an extremely little amount of time either disabling options that shouldn’t have been available, or testing Ubuntu on his hardware before I left. So when Glenn and I got back from a fairly grueling drive back to Flagstaff, it was a natural end to a full day of computer repair, at fairly significant expense to myself, that I received a call from my brother letting me know that he had tried to put his computer into hibernate mode, and that now it wouldn’t boot up.

Naturally, I was incredibly unhappy at having received this news. I had given him the machine 18 months ago, when I could’ve been using it here in Flagstaff to crunch SETI units, be my linux web+shell server, or I could even ahve saved money on the hulu computer by using that machine. Not only did I give it to him, but I’d also upgraded it fairly extensively, to its maximum 2 gigabytes of memory and with a 120 gigabyte disk, and filled it with software that I figured he would find fairly useful. It is a small miracle, I believe, that an installation of Windows XP had lasted 18 months, especially given that he and sometimes his friends use the machine.

At any rate, I still have his data on my external disk, so the initial thought was something like this: “Whatever, I’ll send him tacgnol, at the additional expense to myself, just so that he has something to use.” Then I thought “Well, I could send him the disks and he can reinstall his own OS,” which was followed quickly by “but will he be able to install all of the drivers?” It went on like that for several hours until he called me back the next day letting me know the machine had apparently booted properly that morning. Unfortunately for me, he made the decision to call the following morning and leave a message with no hints as to what was wrong, however indicating fairly strongly that somewhat was indeed wrong, or he wants my help with something I’m unfamiliar with doing — because either nobody else wanted to do it, or because I have set myself up as being the defacto helper.

Either way… when I find out what he wants next, which I unfortunately suspect may be some kind of ploy to get me to expedite the process of upgrading him to the newer, more robust hotbox tower, or sending him tacgnol or der vorlaeufer. Whether or not that’ll happen though is going to be up in the air, as I like having all of those machines around here. Hopefully I’m just overreacting, however.

From time to time I get feedback from one of my friends, coworkers or otherwise readers of the blog, or even just somebody with whom I’m speaking in person or over the telephone. The theme of this feedback is often that I speak and write “like a book.”

The brutal, honest truth here is that this is totally intentional on my part. I don’t know if it’s that I intend to sound stuffy, or if it’s just that I intend to write in such a way as to convey that I’m actually sitting at my computer, much like Kevin Costner in the 1983 Apple Lisa advertisement, or one of those guys in another old computer ad (PDF). You know the kind — they’ve got this guy sitting at the computer in question, and he is considering his science or business data very, very carefully. Like, he’s really serious about this stuff. And he’s sitting in the most awkward position, possibly using the mouse wrong. But man… science or business!

Yeah. That’s basically it. Of course, my vision is slightly altered from either of these. I see it as a situation where I’m sitting at the desk in my office, which is both minimalistic and fairly well-appointed. I have a fairly simple, but huge, desk with a lightly colored granite or granite-like countertop, glossy and smooth to make it easier to use a mouse. Floating in the middle left region of this large surface, which is probably four feet deep by six or eight feet wide, is my computer, which is a late ’80s or early ’90s desktop computer. I’m thinking of something similar to a SiliconGraphics Indigo2, a NeXTStation, or a Mac II series machine. Atop this desktop wonder is a glorious monitor, between sixteen and twenty one inches in diagonal size, and it’s naturally one of the most beautiful monitors available at the time. It matches the machine in question almost perfectly, of course. In front of the machine are a great keyboard and an acceptable and matching mouse.

Although a fairly great office chair is available, it spends much of its time docked in the corner of the room, hidden out of the way of the desk and the fireplace, which as the evening wears on and I lower the desk from standing height to sitting height, brings warmness to the room against the cool, chilling dusk, which peeks in from the large window, the curtain of which had been open just a sliver.

Although the height-adjustable desk is by no means a necessity, especially in the 1990s, It’s something I’d very seriously enjoy having around, especially given that it’s nice and I can sometimes focus better on my work on the computer when I am able to do something and draw my focus to and from the computer as I move around the room with freedom in order to refocus, or reference some printed material, or in the case of my current room/office with more than one computer, do something on another computer. Seriously though, will somebody buy me one of these?

It is also fairly common knowledge that I’m on the war-path against CRT monitors, especially large ones, and old, inefficient machines. So why do I want you to think I’m using a high-watt ’90s technical workstation and a giant CRT display? I think the presumption that I’m making is that this is either “1993 Cory that magically has enough money for a midrange UNIX technical workstation for the purpose of his illustrious writing career,” or “Cory who has discovered the best energy source, and is using this old UNIX machine as a beautiful front end to a small (or large) but far more powerful system, primarily because he can do it without worrying about his carbon footprint.” Also, American writers tend to be granted things like addictions, excesses and the like.

But please, don’t think of me as being addicted to anything, but you can think of me as a 1990s novelist with money to spend on a high end computer, if you’d like.

One of the things about which I dislike complaining, but sometimes dislike even more hearing from, is that kind of person who uses Macs, and can never resist an opportunity to tell you about it. Not just that they like their Mac, because some of the longest-time Mac users and the newest converts tend to be unable to shut up about it, but the people who have been using macs maybe two or three years total, have never intentionally touched a Mac without an Intel processor. Often, they just got their MacBook a few months ago, after having been the worst kind of PC user for a long time.

And what of those of us who were with Apple in the dark times? Those of us who have had Macs long enough to experience ones that maybe weren’t as well-built as some of the current unibody machines? Often, made fun of for the fact that we either can’t afford to buy another Mac, or simply don’t want to, due to fairly significant problems we’ve had in the past, or a switch we’ve made for whatever other reason.

It’s not just the fact that you’re using something that’s not a Mac. It’s the fact that you’re using a totally inferior computing platform, with inferior hardware and inferior hardware. This group even has difficulties acknowledging that the Dell Latitude E6400 XFR and the Panasonic ToughBook series are durable computers. And these are machines designed explicitly to be dropped out of airplanes and shot at fairly close range with powerful guns, and driven over with fire trucks.

Sometimes these particular Mac folks find out that they can join forums where, ostensibly, they can find other people who are as absolutely fanatical about Macs in the same way they are. Unfortunately for them, sometimes people at Mac forums are fairly regular, average people who either can’t afford a Mac, or have more than one computer for different purposes. (I have a Lenovo ThinkPad because I have a fairly legitimate need for a computer with a warranty that covers accidental damage, just as an example.)

I am a very long-time member, somewhat new moderator and new administrator on one such forum whose focus happens to be Macs. (However ours doesn’t tend to cater to the folks who are using OS X on a brand new MacBook, or folks who are only just now using Mac OS X because you can run it on a generic x86 computer.) One of the problems that happens from time to time is some kid gets a MacBook, or some older person gets a MacBook, and they think it’s just the coolest dang thing ever, and absolutely  have the need to, within a few weeks of getting it, tell everybody everywhere a few things.

These things are as follows (in the words of the newly converted):

  • That their MacBook is the coolest, best-designed, most durable computer on the market, for the money it was totally worth it given the gorgeous display, the fact that you can never get viruses or malware ever, and it is probably going to last forever, or until they buy the marginally faster next model up from the next generation.
  • That Mac OS X is the best operating system, it’s the most beautiful, it always works, you never need to restart it, it never gets slow, it has perfect memory handling and under no circumstances shall anybody ever need to perform maintenance of any kind upon Mac software, or by extension, hardware.
  • How they have always wanted a Mac, despite the fact that they were just the other day talking about how Apple should have died in the ’90s, if it weren’t for the massive cash infusion they got from Microsoft.
  • How you might recognize them from [just about any other forum] because they signed up there also, and indeed, at every Mac forum on the Internet, because they love Macs and Steve Jobs that much.
  • How you or somebody else is an inferior human being because you or they have chosen to either own something that’s not an Apple product as your phone, music player or computer, or indeed to own anything from another company, where Apple makes such a device. (Great examples of this involve owning a laptop that’s not a MacBook, owning a media computer that’s not a Mac mini, owning an expandable desktop that’s not an iMac or a Mac Pro, owning a phone that isn’t an iPhone, and even though it hasn’t been released yet, an Internet tablet or e-reader other than the iPad.
  • How they saw this thing they were pretty sure was a Mac on this episode of The Drew Carey Show or Seinfeld or this really cool looking Apple computer and/or device in Batman Beyond.

Some of the items in this list apply to people who have been Mac users longer than just a few weeks, of course, and the most annoying of these things, to me anyway, are the latter items about how people who make the conscious choice to use something other than a Mac are for whatever reason, inferior, either in their intrinsic value as a person or in their reasoning capabilities, or in their value as a person represented by “what they own.”

And I think that brings me to the real issue at hand, at least for me. Some of the people I know are the type of Mac users who use it to think of themselves as better somehow, either because they can afford it, because their lifestyle allows them to use laptops that aren’t very sturdy, or because somebody told them that they could watch and download as much porn as they could ever want, without ever suffering malware and system performance side-effects that Internet Explorer, dangerous torrents and other P2P programs such as LimeWire can cause, when used without caution.

Is somebody who uses a Mac a better person? Probably not– to put it bluntly, most people who have switched to Mac in the past few years are really rude about that fact. They didn’t switch because the Mac has great photography software like Aperture, or because the HFS+ filesystem has benefits over NTFS or EXT3. Most of them don’t even know about Aperture or the Final Cut or Logic series of software, meaning they use mostly if not completely the same software they would have used on their Windows PC. And yet, they’ll throw around buzzwords like UNIX.

But how many Mac users have you actually seen in the past year run scientific or high media or other UNIX-specific software like Mathematica, Final Cut, or BLAST or whatever.

Most of this, of course, applies to legitimate Mac users, people who have been with the Mac a long time, or have fallen in and out of love with it as the platform and their needs of it have changed over the years. People who use Macs because they just want something that works, people who use Macs because they love great design, people who use Macs for their work, and people who use Macs because the Mac is one of the few remaining legitimate UNIX (or formerly UNIX compatible) platforms are an entirely different class of Mac users. This class of Mac users doesn’t care that they use a Mac. They might have been using SGI’s old IRIX operating system if it were still around, they may be recent converts from Sun’s Solaris operating system, they may have gotten a Mac back in the ’80s when it was the computer that could do what they wanted for less than $10,000, or they might just be normal people who don’t love a computer or a corporate CEO more than they do other people.

What’s the solution? Unfortunately I don’t know if there is. Some people are insufferable Mac users. Some people are insufferable Linux users and some people are insufferable owners of Chevrolet vehicles. What the rest of us normal folks need to remember is that we made our decisions based on legitimate factors, and that not everybody who uses any given product is so vocal about it. I’m sure there are a lot of folks out there happily using any given piece of technology to get things done, other than badgering other people about how they should be using that technology.

And, I’ll end this one, which has been a bit of an unplanned ramble I have wanted to have for awhile, with a question for anybody who happens to be reading. Do you know any insufferable Mac users, whether they’re a veteran of the platform, or they think they’re a veteran because their first Mac, a MacBook, is now two years old? If so, or even if you don’t, how do you deal with it? What is your reply when they ask you why your computer isn’t a Mac? What if your computer is a Mac and they talk to you about it as though you should be as crazy as they are?

Interesting things to ponder, for me anyway, when I’m walking between classes.

    One of the things that comes up on a fairly regular basis in an IRC channel I frequent is mobile devices that we use, that we want to use, and the things we like and dislike about them. Of the things that come up, hardware vs software keyboards, the various operating systems, and various form factors come up on a fairly regular basis.

    To add some background, I used a first-generation iPhone with EDGE networking for two years, and I still have it around for looking at different iPhone/Touch applications. Back in January, I switched to a Windows Mobile phone, namely the HTC TouchPro 2 on VerizonWireless, primarily for the hardware keyboard, multi-tasking and for the better coverage VerizonWireless has where I live.

    The conversation about mobile phones in this particular channel tends to tend toward whether it is better to have a physical or a software keyboard. After two years of the iPhone, I would say that I got fairly well used to having a software keyboard, even in situations where I needed to issue UNIX commands to my server and use keyboard shortcuts for screen and irssi.

    The problems with the software keyboard in this case revolve primarily around the fact that the iPhone has a small enough screen that you either use a transparent keyboard above the content in the SSH client, which is done to maximize the amount of available display space, or your SSH client is approximately 24×10 in size, where it should be 80×24 if not taller.

    The problem that arises with a phone that has a hardware keyboard, especially on a platform that allows hardware vendors to provide a non-standard soft keyboard, such as the nonstandard software keyboard provided on Windows Mobile phones sold by HTC. Because Microsoft allows Windows Mobile vendors to do essentially anything they want, there really is no guarantee that the next generation of any given device will do or have any given thing. A great example of this is CTRL keys on phones with physical keyboards. The previous version of my current phone, the HTC TouchPro (Also known as the Fuze, because AT&T loves to re-name things) has a keyboard that includes a CTRL key, meaning that you can easily utilize the keyboard commands for screen. However, the current generation of that phone, the Touch Pro 2, does not have a control key on the keyboard, nor does it or the WinMo SSH application have any way of issuing a CTRL key press on a touchscreen.

    This particular situation is indeed very sad, due to the basically undisputed fact that the HTC TouchPro2 has the largest and most comfortable keyboard on a mobile phone today. But that keyboard is made almost useless to me by the fact that PocketPuTTY is almost completely unusable on the phone which should have the best possible console experience, due to its gargantuan keyboard and very large display resolution.

    What other compromises must be made on mobile platforms? The iPhone sacrifices openness for total stability and reliability, as one example. Windows Mobile and Android sacrifice some stability/reliability along with software compatibility for the fact that they each run on a variety of devices in multiple form factors, more-so Windows Mobile than Android however, just due to the fact that it’s older and is embedded into a few very specific businesses.

    Other examples of fairly significant compromises include the email and web browsing experience, which is dependent both upon the software you’re using and the overall capability of any given device to run that software well, along with things like multimedia.

    The iPhone is really great as a web browser in its ability to pretty faithfully display most if not all web sites, even the original iphone from 2007. My new Windows Mobile phone, despite being faster and having more memory and a faster network connection, takes longer to display web pages, and often renders the pages very poorly in cases. Fortunately, due to the availability of specific applications for Facebook and Twitter, I rarely need to pull up a mobile web browser, and have been observing this even more on the iPhone, for a fairly significant amount of time.

    What compromise is chosen tends to be a product of the priorities of the person who is purchasing the device, and what they know about the devices that are available. Later on down the road, I’m going to examine some more of the compromises that I specifically made with the HTC TouchPro2, and look at some of the other devices available today, with that whole 20/20 hindsight thing.